刘耀, 雷鸣. 基于ICMM法和风险指数评估法的某茶业公司茶尘、噪声职业健康风险评估[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2020, 38(3): 242-245, 267. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.03.007
引用本文: 刘耀, 雷鸣. 基于ICMM法和风险指数评估法的某茶业公司茶尘、噪声职业健康风险评估[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2020, 38(3): 242-245, 267. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.03.007
LIU YAO, LEI Ming. Application of ICMM quantitative evaluation method and occupational hazard risk index method in assessment of occupational health risk caused by tea dust and noise in a tea company[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2020, 38(3): 242-245, 267. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.03.007
Citation: LIU YAO, LEI Ming. Application of ICMM quantitative evaluation method and occupational hazard risk index method in assessment of occupational health risk caused by tea dust and noise in a tea company[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2020, 38(3): 242-245, 267. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.03.007

基于ICMM法和风险指数评估法的某茶业公司茶尘、噪声职业健康风险评估

Application of ICMM quantitative evaluation method and occupational hazard risk index method in assessment of occupational health risk caused by tea dust and noise in a tea company

  • 摘要:
    目的 为建立符合我国实际的茶叶制造职业健康风险评估指南或体系提供依据。
    方法 运用ICMM职业健康评估模型和职业危害风险指数评估法分别对湖南省某茶业公司粉尘、噪声危害进行评估,并对评估结果进行比较。
    结果 该企业存在的主要职业病危害因素为粉尘(茶尘、煤尘)和噪声;两种方法评估结果显示,切茶岗位茶尘职业健康风险、机器压制岗位噪声职业健康风险均最高。
    结论 职业危害风险指数评估法的评估过程更为科学和细致,评估结果更符合实际生产状况。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To provide a basis for the establishment of the guidelines or system for the occupational health risk assessment in tea manufacturing in line with China's actual conditions.
    Methods Two occupational health assessment models, ICMM quantitative evaluation method and the occupational hazard risk index method, were used to evaluate the health risk caused by tea dust and noise in a tea factory in Hunan Province.
    Results The evaluation results showed that the highest occupational health risk caused by tea dust was at tea-cutting worksite and that caused by noise was at machine-compression and shape setting worksite.
    Conclusion By comparing the two evaluation methods, it is found that the evaluation process of the occupational hazard risk index method is more scientific and detailed, and the evaluation result was more consistent with the actual production situation.

     

/

返回文章
返回