周思宇, 吴珍, 黄仙红. 基于数字治理的浙江省未来社区卫生应急管理路径研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2023, 41(3): 329-333. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.03.015
引用本文: 周思宇, 吴珍, 黄仙红. 基于数字治理的浙江省未来社区卫生应急管理路径研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2023, 41(3): 329-333. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.03.015
ZHOU Siyu, WU Zhen, HUANG Xianhong. Study on future health emergency management pathways in communities based on digital governance in Zhejiang Province[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2023, 41(3): 329-333. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.03.015
Citation: ZHOU Siyu, WU Zhen, HUANG Xianhong. Study on future health emergency management pathways in communities based on digital governance in Zhejiang Province[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2023, 41(3): 329-333. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.03.015

基于数字治理的浙江省未来社区卫生应急管理路径研究

Study on future health emergency management pathways in communities based on digital governance in Zhejiang Province

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析浙江省未来社区卫生应急管理的影响因素并归纳总结卫生应急管理路径。
      方法  基于浙江省未来社区卫生应急管理的政策发布及官方报道文本,将浙江省第一批24个“未来社区”创建名单作为研究对象,检索2019—2022年浙江省政府网站和当地市(区)县有关未来社区的相关内容,使用fs/QCA 3.0软件,对影响未来社区卫生应急管理的因素进行赋值,以及一致性评分和组合覆盖率评分。
      结果  卫生人员数量与能力、数字化建设程度、卫生应急预案、应急物资储备与保障、卫生应急场所和是未来社区应急管理的主要影响因素,一致性评分依次为0.93、0.78、0.69、0.65、0.34。组合路径分析结果显示,卫生人员数量与能力* 数字化建设程度*~卫生应急场所的原覆盖率为0.54,卫生人员数量与能力* 应急物资储备与保障* 卫生应急预案*~卫生应急场所的原覆盖率为0.32。
      结论  卫生人员数量与能力是评价未来社区卫生应急管理的必要条件。基层社区卫生应急管理路径设计需要进一步关注,并规划卫生人员数量与能力、应急物资储备与保障、卫生应急预案,同时结合数字化建设对社区卫生应急管理的各主体进行数字化赋能,以提升社区卫生应急管理能力与效能。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze the factors influencing the future health emergency management of communities in Zhejiang Province and summarize the health emergency management pathways.
      Methods  Based on policy releases and official reports on future community health emergency management in Zhejiang Province, the first batch of 24"future communities" in Zhejiang Province were used as the research objects. The fs/QCA 3.0 software was used to assign values to the factors influencing future community health emergency management, as well as consistency scores and combined coverage scores.
      Results  The number and capacity of health personnel, the degree of digitalization, health emergency plans, emergency supplies storage and security, and health emergency sites are the main influencing factors for future community emergency management. The consistency scores were 0.93, 0.78, 0.69, 0.65, and 0.34 in that order. Number and capacity of health personnel * degree of digital construction *-original coverage rate of health emergency sites is 0.54. Number and capacity of health personnel* emergency supplies stockpile and security * health emergency plan *-original coverage rate of health emergency sites is 0.32.
      Conclusions  The number and capacity of health personnel is a necessary condition for evaluating the future of community health emergency management. The design of the pathway for grassroots community health emergency management needs to further focus on and plan for the number and capacity of health personnel, the stockpiling and securing of emergency supplies, and health emergency plans, as well as digitally empowering the various bodies of community health emergency management in conjunction with digital construction to improve the capacity and effectiveness of community health emergency management.

     

/

返回文章
返回