麦秋苑, 唐侍豪, 赵远, 吴康勇, 徐绍雄, 张晋蔚, 周丽屏, 王致. 基于无人机的应急救援场景有毒气体采样检测技术分析J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(3): 372-377. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250547
引用本文: 麦秋苑, 唐侍豪, 赵远, 吴康勇, 徐绍雄, 张晋蔚, 周丽屏, 王致. 基于无人机的应急救援场景有毒气体采样检测技术分析J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(3): 372-377. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250547
MAI Qiuyuan, TANG Shihao, ZHAO Yuan, WU Kangyong, XU Shaoxiong, ZHANG Jinwei, ZHOU Liping, WANG Zhi. Analysis of drone-based toxic gas sampling and detection technology in emergency rescue scenariosJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(3): 372-377. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250547
Citation: MAI Qiuyuan, TANG Shihao, ZHAO Yuan, WU Kangyong, XU Shaoxiong, ZHANG Jinwei, ZHOU Liping, WANG Zhi. Analysis of drone-based toxic gas sampling and detection technology in emergency rescue scenariosJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(3): 372-377. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250547

基于无人机的应急救援场景有毒气体采样检测技术分析

Analysis of drone-based toxic gas sampling and detection technology in emergency rescue scenarios

  • 摘要:

    目的 探究适用于危险化学品火灾或泄漏现场的无人机有毒气体检测方法,以提升现场侦检效率,降低救援人员安全风险。

    方法 模拟演练情景设定为某高层建筑危化品仓库发生火灾,采用四旋翼飞行器搭载有毒气体检测仪飞行至模拟事故火灾点附近,对有毒气体进行采样检测,共测量了8种气体。为验证无人机采样检测结果的可靠性,预先在演练场地参照毒物扩散规律及无人机采样点位,布设3个固定地面参考监测站,在每个固定点位,无人机与地面站同步采样30组数据,并分析两种检测结果的相关性。

    结果 Pearson相关分析结果显示,无人机与地面站同步采样数据的3个相关系数均> 0.94,表明无人机采样检测准确可靠。采样期间共监测了多种气体(挥发性有机物、CO、Cl2、NO2、H2S、CO2、CxHy、O2)参数,检测相对高度为0~54.80 m。样本采集速率达到4 036个/h,采集速率优于人工方法,并通过等高线/三维点云分析生成详细的有毒气体空间分布图谱。

    结论 基于无人机的有毒气体采样检测技术,实现了对火灾场景有毒气体的远程安全、精准检测,在危化品火灾或泄漏等突发事件应急处置中有助于降低救援人员的安全风险,提高采样检测效率。

     

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate drone-based toxic gas detection methods suitable for hazardous chemical fires or leakage sites, aiming to improve on-site reconnaissance efficiency and reduce safety risks for rescue personnel.

    Methods A simulated scenario was designed in which a fire occurred in a high-rise hazardous chemical warehouse. A quadrotor drone equipped with a toxic gas detector was deployed to the simulated accident site to collect and analyze some kinds of airborne toxic gases. To validate the reliability of drone sampling results, three fixed ground reference monitoring stations were established in accordance with toxicant dispersion patterns and drone sampling locations. At each station, the drone and ground monitors simultaneously collected 30 sets of data, and the correlation between the two datasets was analyzed.

    Results Pearson correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficients of the three paired datasets were all greater than 0.94, indicating that drone-based sampling was accurate and reliable. During sampling, eight gases (VOCs, CO, Cl2, NO2, H2S, CO2, CxHy, O2) were monitored at relative altitudes ranging from 0 to 54.80 m. The sample acquisition rate reached 4,036 samples per hour, outperforming manual methods. Furthermore, contour and 3D point cloud analyses were used to generate detailed spatial distribution maps of toxic gases.

    Conclusions Drone-based toxic gas sampling and detection technology enables safe and remote precise monitoring of toxic gases in fire scenarios. This approach can help reduce risks to rescue personnel and enhances sampling efficiency in emergency response to hazardous chemical fires or leaks.

     

/

返回文章
返回