万军红, 叶开友. 石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定唾液中的锰[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2017, 35(6): 497-499, 506. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.06.001
引用本文: 万军红, 叶开友. 石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定唾液中的锰[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2017, 35(6): 497-499, 506. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.06.001
WAN Junhong, YE Kaiyou. Detection of manganese in saliva with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2017, 35(6): 497-499, 506. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.06.001
Citation: WAN Junhong, YE Kaiyou. Detection of manganese in saliva with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2017, 35(6): 497-499, 506. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.06.001

石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定唾液中的锰

Detection of manganese in saliva with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

  • 摘要:
    目的 建立一种唾液中锰的石墨炉原子吸收分光光度检测方法。
    方法 选取接触锰的234名工人为接触组, 再将其分为高浓度接触组和低浓度接触组; 选取不接触锰的135名工人作为对照组。采集唾液, 离心, 取0.5 mL上清液加硝酸消解, 用体积分数0.2%硝酸定容至2 mL后, 于原子吸收仪上测定。
    结果 方法最佳灰化温度1 100℃, 最佳原子化温度1 900℃, 一次线性回归方程为Y=0.015 87 x+0.004 80, 相关系数0.999 2(P < 0.01), 特征浓度5.4 pg/0.004 4 Abs, 检出限为5.8 pg, 加标回收率为85%~106%, 相对标准偏差1.5%~1.8%。对照组工人唾液锰质量浓度均值(7.65 ±5.57)μg/L, 接触组工人(10.63 ±12.37)μg/L, 两组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。低浓度接触组唾液锰质量浓度(7.68 ±6.98)μg/L, 高浓度接触组为(13.38 ±15.36)μg/L, 两组均值差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。
    结论 该方法下不同锰接触水平人员的唾液中锰检测值不同, 且该方法灵敏度高, 准确度好, 操作简便, 故提示其可能适合于人体中锰的采样测定。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To establish the graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry method to examine the manganese in saliva.
    Methods After centrifuge of saliva, 0.5 mL of the supernatant was digested with nitric acid. 0.2% nitric acid was added to the constant volume 2 mL. The specimen was measured with atomic absorption spectrometer. Then samples of 234 welding workers and 135 control workers were detected.
    Results The best ashing temperature of the method was 1 100℃, and the optimum atomic temperature was 1 900℃. The linear regression equation was Y=0.015 87 x + 0.004 80 with the correlation coefficient 0.999 2(P < 0.01). The characteristics of concentration was 5.4 pg/0.004 4 Abs, and the detection limit was 5.8 pg. The recovery rate was 85%-106% with relative standard deviation 1.5%-1.8%. The average value of saliva manganese concentration was (7.65 ±5.57) g/L and(10.63 ±12.37) g/L in the control and welding workers, respectively(P < 0.01). The concentration of manganese varied among workers with lower or higher exposure level, (7.68 ±6.98)g/L vs.(13.38 + 15.36) g/L(P < 0.01).
    Conclusion The method is highly sensitive and accurate, easy to manipulate and well repeated. These suggested the method may be suitable for sampling and determination of manganese in human body.

     

/

返回文章
返回